Melbet Partners pays revenue share up to 40%, plus CPA and hybrid models. The ceiling is lower than most of this list, so the case for Melbet rests on its GEO coverage rather than its rates.
The operator
Melbet is a sportsbook and casino operator with reach across Africa, South Asia, the CIS and parts of LATAM. It's in the same competitive tier as 1xBet and Mostbet and competes largely on the same markets, often with localised payment methods that matter enormously in those regions.
Commission models
Revenue share reaches 40%. CPA and hybrid deals are available and negotiated per GEO and traffic type, as is standard in this vertical.
Forty percent is genuinely below par here. 1win starts affiliates at 50%, Vavada starts at 50%, and Royal reaches 55%. If you're choosing purely on revenue share, Melbet is not the pick.
Where it earns its place
Local market fit. Melbet supports payment methods and localised interfaces in African markets in particular, where a global brand with a slicker product may still lose because players can't deposit conveniently. Conversion is decided at the cashier more often than affiliates expect.
Test it against a competitor in the same GEO rather than assuming the higher revenue share wins. On the same traffic, the operator your audience can actually pay may earn more at 40% than a rival at 55%.
Who converts
African markets, particularly Nigeria, Kenya and Tanzania, plus South Asia and the CIS. Football content converts hardest, followed by app-download guides, since almost all of this traffic is mobile. Localised content in the market's language substantially outperforms English.
European and North American traffic is wasted, with the usual publisher-side regulatory exposure in licensed markets.
Melbet vs 1xBet
Melbet Partners
1xBet Partners
RevShare
Up to 40%
15 to 40%, up to 50%
CPA
Negotiated
Up to $250
Brand reach
Africa, South Asia, CIS
Broader globally
Payment localisation
Strong in Africa
Strong
1xBet is the bigger brand with the higher ceiling and a lower payout threshold. Melbet's argument is market-specific: in some African GEOs it converts better despite the lower rate. Split-test rather than assuming.
Getting approved
Register at melbetpartners.com. Approval is quick and you get a manager. Since 40% is the published ceiling, negotiate on CPA and hybrid terms for your specific GEOs instead of trying to move the revenue share.
Verdict
A secondary program rather than a primary one, worth carrying for African and South Asian traffic where local payment support wins conversions that a higher rate elsewhere would never capture. Don't choose it on rates, because on rates it loses to almost everything on this list.
What does Melbet Partners pay?
Revenue share up to 40%, plus CPA and hybrid models negotiated per GEO. That ceiling is genuinely below par next to 1win at 50% or Royal at 55%.
Why use it then?
Local market fit. Melbet supports payment methods and localised interfaces in African markets where a slicker global brand still loses because players cannot deposit conveniently. Conversion is decided at the cashier more often than affiliates expect.
Which markets convert?
Africa first, particularly Nigeria, Kenya and Tanzania, plus South Asia and the CIS. Football content converts hardest and almost all traffic is mobile.
Should I choose it over 1xBet?
Split-test rather than assuming. 1xBet has the higher ceiling and lower threshold, but in some African GEOs Melbet converts better despite the lower rate.
Add a review